Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Doe et al v. South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind et al
as 7:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Mary Roe
Defendant:
South Carolina School for the Deaf and Blind and Pamela C Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Charlie Esters Foley et al vs Town of Nichols et al
as 4:2009cv01217
Plaintiff:
Charlie Esters Foley, Charlie Clayton Jackson Foley, Charles Codey Foley and others
Defendant:
Nichols, Town of, Marion County, James C Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves et al v. City of Mullins et al
as 4:2008cv01818
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves, Vastena Reaves, Donald N Reaves and others
Defendant:
City of Mullins, Marion County, W Kenneth McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad WKA Qadir v. Cooke et al
as 4:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Muhammad WKA Qadir
Defendant:
HL Cooke, John Doe, Unknown Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Reaves et al v. Mullins, City of et al
as 4:2007cv03559
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Reaves and Vastena Reaves
Defendant:
Mullins, City of, Marion County, W Kenneth McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnsongray v. Shaw et al
as 2:2007cv00795
Plaintiff:
Putu Johnsongray
Defendant:
Theodore Daniel Shaw, Theodore Daniel Shaw, John R Zumalt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
