Cases 21 - 30 of 241
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drew Miller
Defendant:
County of Hamilton, Tennessee, Sheriff Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Tepe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
United States, Curtis L Collier, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ledford v. City of Red Bank, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
William Rex Ledford
Defendant:
City of Red Bank, Tennessee, Leigh Taylor Noorbergen and Daniel White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacobs v. Roberts et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ross Jacobs
Defendant:
Joseph Roberts and City of Murfreesboro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
