Cases 21 - 30 of 189
Davis v. Telfair County et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Davis
Defendant:
Telfair County, Edwin Neal, Annie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAW et al v. GRIFFIN et al
as 7:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
SHEILA SUMMERLIN SHAW and HOYT S SUMMERLIN, JR
Defendant:
TERRY GRIFFIN, JARED CROSBY and ANTHONY BRAHNAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Jobe
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Thad Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01475
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wallis et al v. The City of Lawrenceville, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallis and Avie Terris
Defendant:
The City of Lawrenceville, Georgia and Chuck Warbington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danielle Bey v. Centralized Infractions Bureau et al
as 1:2021cv03884
Plaintiff:
Malka Yasmin Danielle Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Centralized Infractions Bureau, Georgia Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
