Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 286
Bragg v. Jordan
as 23-615
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for New York County
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Jordan, in his official capacity as Chairman of the committee on the Judiciary and Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: Mark F. Pomerantz
Petitioner: American Center for Law and Justice
Bragg, Jr. v. Jordan
as 23-616
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., in his official capacity as District Attorney for New York County
Defendant / Appellee: Jim Jordan, in his official capacity as Chairman of the committee on the Judiciary and Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: Mark F. Pomerantz
Bragg v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03032
Plaintiff: Alvin L. Bragg, Jr.
Defendant: Jim Jordan, Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives and Mark F. Pomerantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rivera v. United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff: Jacinto Rivera
Defendant: United States; U.S. Government; The United States; U.S., Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The Biden-Harris Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3234
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Magistrelli v. Former US Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant: Former US Attorney, Former United States of America President, Illinois Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff: Karol Dawn Magistrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al v. Alviti
as 22-1796
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC., M&M TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: PETER ALVITI, JR., in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation
Defendant: RHODE ISLAND TURNPIKE AND BRIDGE AUTHORITY
Interested Party: STEPHEN UCCI, Member of the Rhode Island House of Representatives, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Governor of the State of Rhode Island and NICHOLAS A. MATTIELLO, Speaker of the Rhode Island House of Representatives
Andrew Clyde, et al v. William Walker, et al
as 22-5263
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andrew S. Clyde, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Louie Gohmert, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and Lloyd Smucker, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellee: William J. Walker, In his Official Capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives and Catherine Szpindor, In her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives
Michael Ward, et al v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 22-16473
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL P. WARD, Dr., D.O., husband, KELLI WARD, Dr., D.O., wife and MOLE MEDICAL SERVICES PC, an Arizona Professional Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL, a committee of the United States House of Representatives and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?