Cases 21 - 30 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLAGOLA v. MACFANN et al
as 2:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
ALYSSIA GLAGOLA
Defendant:
WALTER MACFANN, TRI-COUNTY REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P. and AMW CONSULTING, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01951
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WOLFFE v. GALDENZI et al
as 2:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MATEER WOLFFE
Defendant:
WALTER J. GALDENZI, SOUTHERN CROSS INVESTMENTS INC., DAYS INN WORLWIDE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parfaite v. Lippincott
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Walter Parfaite
Defendant:
Kim Lippincott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hyde v. Reed et al
as 4:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Walter Hyde
Defendant:
Code Officer Davit Reed and The Shamokin Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
