Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sulzner v. ODNI Directors et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Justin Paul Sulzner
Defendant:
ODNI Directors, Steven Oliver Hoard, Paul Pomrehn, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. United States Department of the Treasury
as 3:2021cv03026
Plaintiff:
Allen Curtis Miles
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mossman et al v. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Asa Mossman, Richard McConkie, Millstone Properties, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rochelle P. Walensky, Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sulzner et al v. United States Intelligence Agency, et al
as 1:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Justin Paul Sulzner, Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, Inc and Christian Congregatation of Jehovah's Witnesses (CCJW)
Defendant:
United States Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jaye v. USA, et al--PER #3 ORDER PLAINTIFF AUTHORIZED TO EMAIL HIS PLEADINGS
as 1:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Mary Melfi, William Barr, Robert E Kirschman and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downey v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00077
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
