Cases 21 - 30 of 9,517
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Marcus Whybark
Defendant:
Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Mora v. Seattle Housing Authority
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Olivia Mora
Defendant:
Seattle Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Leighty v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Leighty
Defendant:
Spokane County, Sheriff John Nowels and Spokane County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Canfield et al v. Grant County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Dustin Canfield and Darrik Gregg
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriffs Office, Grant County, Ryan Rectenwald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
