Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Armstrong v. Alliance Mazda Kia
as 5:2012cv00808
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Alliance Mazda Kia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Stephens et al
as 5:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Donald W. Stephens and Colon Willoughby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Sumner et al
as 5:2012cv00425
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner and Rachel Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Ahmad Rasul El-Amin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Purdue et al
as 5:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Beverly Purdue, Eugene Conti, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. City of Knightdale et al
as 5:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Knightdale, Skip Blaylock, J.T. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
North Carolina, Roy Cooper, Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
North Carolina, Roy Cooper, J.S. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, CITY OF DURHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. County of Wilson et al
as 5:2008cv00634
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
County of Wilson, Wayne Gay and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
