Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Steven Glenn: Johnson
Defendant:
Scott E. Thomas, Sarah M. Kirkman, J. B. Stroud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West et al v. Tyrrell County et al
as 2:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie West and Chase Adam Spruill
Defendant:
Tyrrell County , Tyrrell County Sheriff's Department , Darryl Liverman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FENNER v. BELL
as 1:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
WALDO FENNER
Defendant:
BILL BELL, PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
We Are all Connected, Inc v. Value Options, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
We Are all Connected, Inc
Defendant:
Value Options, Inc., East Carolina Behavioral Health, Joy Futrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT., AARON GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
