Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Johnson v. Broussard et al
as 5:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
Pamela T. Johnson
Defendant:
Robert L. Broussard , Blake L. Dorning , David K. Jernigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Junkins v. Dejong et al
as 5:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Richard G Junkins
Defendant:
Daniel Dejong , Blake Dorning , David Jernigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart et al v. Franklin et al
as 5:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
Glenda Lockhart and Straightline Drywall & Acoustical LLC
Defendant:
Ana Franklin , Robert Wilson and Blake Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Dorning et al
as 5:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Blake Dorning and Tommy Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Madison County Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01166
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama, Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stryker v. Homewood, City of et al
as 2:2016cv00832
Plaintiff:
Moses Stryker
Defendant:
Homewood, City of, Jim Roberson, Jason Davis and others
Miscellaneou:
White Arnold Dowd and Burke Harvey, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
Whitney Elizabeth Foster
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc , Arthur Williams, Emmanuel Mbi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parton v. Dorning et al
as 5:2015cv02221
Plaintiff:
Steve Parton
Defendant:
Blake Dorning , Steve Watson, Curtis Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shell v. The City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Irvin Shell
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery , Raymond D. Carson , Blake A. Brauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
