Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv00536
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lumsden et al v. Carlos O'Brien's et al
as 2:2012cv00592
Plaintiff:
Debra Lumsden and Shanna Baker
Defendant:
Carlos O'Brien's and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Teters v. Borst Automotive Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00727
Plaintiff:
Dolly G Teters
Defendant:
Borst Automotive Incorporated, Carla Sotomayor, Scott MacMillan Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry v. Universal Technical Institute et al
as 2:2011cv01773
Plaintiff:
Tami E Henry
Defendant:
Universal Technical Institute, Kimberly McWaters, Mike White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Guy B. Baker v. Palisades Collection LLC
as 4:2009cv00283
Defendant:
PALISADES COLLECTION LLC and PALISADES COLLECTION LLC
Plaintiff:
Guy B Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00273
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
