Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Fontaine v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Tornello Fontaine
Defendant:
City of Charlotte , Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department , T. Bobrek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Barber
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, A. A. Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landry v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2010cv00585
Plaintiff:
Angelique Landry
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Rickey Sanders
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, WCNC News 36, Laura S. Orlou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 10-7292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, DANIEL E. BAILEY, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department, JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Randy Thomas v. Ynez Olshausen
as 08-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
YNEZ OLSHAUSEN, MARY ELLEN MCDONALD, PETER GORMAN and others
Randy Thomas v. Ynez Olshausen
as 08-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
YNEZ OLSHAUSEN, MARY ELLEN MCDONALD, PETER GORMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
