Cases 31 - 40 of 2,311
CHASE v. ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Defendant:
GORDON THAMES, ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC and JILL HEWITT
Plaintiff:
LINDA C CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
CHASE v ST. JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
LINDA C CHASE
Defendant:
CARMEN WORLEY, MARY MATOS-WEATHERS and ST JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2024cv00514
Defendant:
Zera Augustus Rowley, Travis Marvin Kenison, Juab County and others
Plaintiff:
Clay James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2024cv00515
Defendant:
Juab County, Chase Nathan Oliver, Travis Marvin Kenison and others
Plaintiff:
Clay James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Florence Kasumba et al
as 2:2024cv05912
Defendant:
Chase, Harbor Freight, Michaels Furniture and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McDuffee, Chase v. Federal Communications Commission
as 3:2024cv00464
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission
Plaintiff:
Chase G. McDuffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chase v. Costlow, et al
as 24-1593
Defendant:
JOHN C. NIVISON, BANGOR, ME, FREDERICK F. COSTLOW and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. CHASE
Urscher v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 5:2024cv00343
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Eric Albert Urscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
