Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Daniel Willis v. Tyndall Lewi
as 16-2425
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TYNDALL LEWIS
Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton
as 16-2428
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOWN OF TRENTON, and its Council Members, and/or their Successors, GLENN SPIVEY, Town Clerk and /or their Successor and SHERI M. DAVENPORT
Daniel Willis v. Jones County Brd of Education
as 16-2424
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JONES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Daniel Willis v. Michael Bracy
as 16-2426
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL T. BRACY, Superintendent, Jones County Schools, BRENDA REECE and JONES COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC
as 16-2422
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA, DAN WOOTEN, Individually and as Leading Attorney, CAROL M. HOOD, Individually and as Personal Representative and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mincey et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv04459
Plaintiff:
Casey Mincey , Chante Waide and Marissa Adkins
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Homer Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sara Weiss
as 15-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, THE MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE LAW FIRM, in its corporate capacity for damages and for qui tam recovery, JOHN ANDREW DELANEY, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Adams v. Johnson
as 6:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Idella Adams
Defendant:
Edgar Daniel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
