Cases 31 - 40 of 435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carter v. Macy's et al
as 3:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Defendant:
Macy's, Ann Scanlon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Swix et al
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeygar Vargas
Defendant:
Michael Swix, Corey Baldwin, Michael Cuneo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DiRubba v. Garafalo et al
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Luigi DiRubba
Defendant:
Salvatore Garafalo, DCF, New Haven County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Guardian Asset Management et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Roney Harris
Defendant:
Guardian Asset Management, Jerry Mavellia, HSBC Bank USA, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pileggi et al v. Mathias et al
as 3:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Katharine Pileggi and Anthony Pileggi
Defendant:
Kim Mathias, Joette Katz, Kaela Minerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
