Cases 31 - 40 of 435
Welch v. Woods et al
as 1:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Christy Welch
Defendant:
Danny Woods, Haven Jones and Leiann Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones et al v. Esquivel et al (TV2)
as 1:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Jones, Don Carter, Robert Winters and others
Defendant:
David R. Esquivel and Howard Jefferson Atkins
Intervenor:
Michael Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McCurry et al v. Wright (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry and Etha Jones
Defendant:
Senior Judge Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurry et al v. Wright (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Etha Jones and Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Senior Judge Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whyte v. Hazley et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Andrew Hazley, Will Fraley, f/n/u Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grant v. Fultz et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
United States and Lovie D. Grant
Defendant:
Joyce Fultz, J. Phillip Jones, J. Phillip Jones Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
