Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Angel Osornio v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al
as 19-55082
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL OSORNIO
Angel Osornio v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
as 5:2018cv02341
Defendant:
Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc
Plaintiff:
Angel Osornio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Duru v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv01561
Defendant:
Eric Brennen, Mark S. Zemelman, Kaiser Family Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv06621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Diem T. Nguyen v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00905
Defendant:
Mark Lottman, County of Orange, Does 1-10, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Diem T. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
