Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Carter-Lawson v. Gary Police Dept et al
as 2:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Carmen Carter-Lawson
Defendant:
Gary Police Dept and D Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibens v. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicle et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
John E Gibens
Defendant:
Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicle, Connie Lawson and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. et al v. KING et al
as 1:2012cv00800
Defendant:
TRENT DECKARD, J. BRADLEY KING and CONNIE LAWSON
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. and TRUE THE VOTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GARWOOD et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2011cv00072
Defendant:
NADINE ALLEE, TRAVIS BAKER, PAIGE BOGGS and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN GARWOOD and VIRGINIA GARWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Hughes et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Julius W Lawson
Defendant:
Tim Hughes, David Tinsley and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
