Cases 31 - 40 of 56
HUERTA v. EWING et al
as 2:2016cv00397
Defendant:
BRAD ANDERSON, JUDY ANDERSON, MARK D. BIRD and others
Plaintiff:
JAUSTON HUERTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BAUGHN v. BRITT et al
as 2:2016cv00342
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CURTIS BAUGHN
Defendant:
SHAWN BRITT, MICHAEL P. MORRIS and JIM RINEHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Jaques et al
as 2:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gary Joe Harrison
Defendant:
J Jaques , Captain Morris , Jeff Bang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qualls v. Gary Indiana City of
as 2:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Hakimah Qualls
Defendant:
Gary Indiana City of , J Franklin , Emilio Guajardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MORRIS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv01303
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, OFFICER JANE DOE, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
FRED CORRELL, BRENTON FORDHAM, TINA MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
TWITTY v. KNOX COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY, KNOX COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, KNOX COUNTY COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE TWITTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
