Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Robinson v. State of New York et al
as 11-2999
Plaintiff - Appellant: David Robinson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, George Alexander, Chairman, New York State Division of Parole, in his individual and official capacity, Michael Fork, Bureau Chief, in his individual and official capacity and others
Locantore v. Hunt
as 11-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Locantore
Defendant: Stephanie Coleman, New York State Parole Officer
Defendant - Appellee: Carl Hunt, Superintendent of Groveland Correctional Facility, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the State of New York Department of Correctional Services, Brion D. Travis, Chairman of the New York State Division of Parole and others
Sudler v. City of New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant: Terence Sudler
Defendant: Bureau Chief, Department Of Corrections Custody Management & Environmental Health Department from June 2005 to July 2006, Coordinator New York City Department Of Corrections Inmate Records, from June 2005 to July 2006, John Doe, Clerical Staff Worker at Rikers Island who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS) and others
Defendant - Appellee: City of New York, Martin F. Horn, of the New York City Department of Corrections (NYCDOC), Warden, Who was in charge of Plaintiff's Correctional Facility at Rikers Island and others
Batthany v. Horn
as 11-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant: Timothy Batthany
Defendant - Appellee: John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff's NYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Richard Roe Supervisor of John Doe Clerical Staff Worker(s) at Plaintiff'sNYC DOC Correctional Facility, who failed to transmit Plaintiff's sentencing paperwork to the New York State Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), John Does, Employees of the City of New York and others
Haynes v. Zaporowski
as 11-228
Plaintiff - Appellant: Timmie L. Haynes
Defendant - Appellee: David Zaporowski, New York State Parole Officer, Supervisors of David Zaporowski, New York State Division of Parole and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Bailey v. Pataki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2563
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kenneth Bailey, Robert Trocchio, Jorge Burgos, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellant: George Pataki, former Governor of New York State, Eileen Consilvio, former Executive Director, Manhattan Psychiatric Center and Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, John Doe, # 1, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and others
Rivera v. Robert J. Butera
as 10-2472
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Rivera
Defendant: City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, John Doe, One thorugh five, names being fictitious, true names being unknown to plaintiff, persons intended being those employees of the New York City Department of Corrections whose acts or omission resulted in the events complained of in this action and others
Defendant - Appellee: Robert Butera
Robinson v. State of New York
as 10-1634
Plaintiff - Appellant: David Robinson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, George Alexander, Chairman, New York State Division of Parole, in his individual and official capacity, Michael Fork, Bureau Chief, in his individual and official capacity and others
Lamberty et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01793
Defendant: Parole Officer George Blackett, Parole Officer Stanley Brown, Andrew M. Cuomo and others
Plaintiff: Noel Lamberty, Sabriel Lamberty and Jonathan Neary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?