Cases 31 - 40 of 442
Otero v. Rockport P. D. et al
as 2:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mathew Otero
Defendant:
Rockport P. D. and Noah Leuschner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. Raabe d/b/a McDonald's of Elsa et al
as 7:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Odyssey P. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Dale R. Raabe d/b/a McDonald's of Elsa and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Randall et al v. New Caney Independent School District
as 4:2023cv02332
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Randall and S. P.
Defendant:
New Caney Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fenimore v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Rodney P Fenimore
Defendant:
Wendy Hill and City of Mesquite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Freedman et al
as 5:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Defendant:
Saul Freedman, Monica Littman, Kaufman Dolowich Voluck, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez et al
as 5:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
