Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. United States Government et al
as 8:2022cv01374
Defendant:
Eddie James & the Child Sex Traffickers w/ Kirk Franklin & Associates of Fulton Industrial Blvd, United States Government, Walmart and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Ruth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60884
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R. Irby, David P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60883
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R Irby, David P Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Publix Stores et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tonya Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Stores and Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
