Cases 31 - 40 of 1,585
Sanders v. Reyes-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01296
Defendant:
Jesus Alberto Reyes-Ramos
Plaintiff:
Trenton Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ramos v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Respondent:
City of Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi Police Department and Jamie Wingo
Petitioner:
JESUS MATIAS RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Najera v. Board of County Commissioners of The County of Chaves et al
as 2:2024cv00656
Defendant:
Ricardo Delgado, Michael Herrington, Raul Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Emeli Najera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01553
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Curtis Robinson v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04710
Defendant:
EVAN A MARTINEZ, Does 1 through 10, Mark E. Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Konan v. Saydah et al
as 6:2024cv00886
Defendant:
Saydah Law Firm, Neil A. Saydah, Joel Ramos, II and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Konan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
