Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Steve Thompson, et al v. Santa Cruz County Human Servic, et al
as 13-16047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE THOMPSON and SHANNON THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, DENINE GUY, The Honorable, ROBERT JOSEPH PEREZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson et al v. Santa Cruz County Human Services Department et al
as 5:2012cv03894
Plaintiff:
Steve Thompson and Shannon Thompson
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County Human Services Department, Denine J. Guy, Robert Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrick v. Santa Cruz County et al
as 5:2012cv03852
Plaintiff:
Paul Carrick
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County , Planning Department County of Santa Cruz , Neal Coonerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Coates et al v. Santa Cruz, County of et al
as 4:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wayne Coates and Patricia Wiercinski
Defendant:
Santa Cruz, County of , Keith Barth , Beth Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2011cv05401
Plaintiff:
Adrian O. Adams
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Department and Patrick Dimick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rupert et al v. Atack et al
as 5:2010cv02172
Plaintiff:
William Rupert and Carol Slater
Defendant:
Robert B. Atack, Ronald M. George, Alex Clavo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
