Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thody v. United States of America et al
as 6:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walter Eliyah Thody
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank H. Seay, James H. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Irvin
as 5:2017cv01233
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christine Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barron v. United States of America et al
as 6:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Barron
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Forest Service, Timothy Fincham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Circle D Pawn No 4 Inc et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
Circle D Pawn No 4 Inc and Billy Dale Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Steve Cruse, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt et al v. The State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt and African Americans
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Whites in The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berry v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
Duane Letroy Berry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Circle D Pawn No 4 Inc et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Circle D Pawn No 4 Inc and Billy Dale Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Steve Cruze and Lawrence Dale Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
