Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Chantilly Store ALL LLC v. Spear et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00921
Plaintiff: Chantilly Store ALL LLC
Defendant: Sarah G Spear, John Ashmore and Debbie Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCalpine v. Person et al
as 7:2008cv00613
Plaintiff: Sarah McCalpine and Finis Person
Defendant: Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Parker v. City of Fort Deposit, Alabama et al
as 2:2007cv01129
Plaintiff: Sarah Parker
Defendant: City of Fort Deposit, Alabama and Ben Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00581
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00799
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00516
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KPL et al v. Alabama State Board of Human Resources et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff: KPL and Karl Randolph Lentz
Defendant: Alabama State Board of Human Resources, Bob Riley, Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?