Cases 41 - 50 of 283
De Shazo, et al. v. Bieter, et al.
as 1:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
Thomas A De Shazo and Natasha J. Ray
Respondent:
Judge Christopher M Bieter, Judge Annie Mcdavitt, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Filler, et al. v. Dwello, et al.
as 1:2021cv00391
Plaintiff:
John Filler and Leslie Filler
Defendant:
Miren M. Unsworth, Susan Dwello, Jasmine Olmedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polatis v. Bingham County et al
as 4:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christian John Polatis
Defendant:
Bingham County, Craig T. Rowland, Brock Katseanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polatis v. Katseanes et al
as 4:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Christian Polatis
Defendant:
Brock Katseanes, Jared Miller, Todd Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackman v. City of Pocatello et al
as 4:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Jackman
Defendant:
City of Pocatello, Roger Schei, Kevin Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiting v. City of Rexburg, et al.
as 4:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ashtyn Whiting and Ashtyne Whiting
Defendant:
City of Rexburg, Rexburg Police Department, Shane Turman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schroeder, et al. v. Payette County, et al.
as 1:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Barry Schroeder and Della Schroeder
Defendant:
Payette County, Payette County Sheriff's Office, Henry Esquivel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Walmart Stores Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc, Walmart, Inc. and John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nichols v. Preston
as 4:2021cv00221
Defendant:
David Preston
Plaintiff:
Justin John Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
