Cases 41 - 50 of 634
Alli v. Leda et al
as 3:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Dartanin Alli and Dartanin Ali
Defendant:
Hanna Leda, H Leda, M Cavurro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
EASTERLING v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gill v. Hammond The City of et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gill
Defendant:
Hammond The City of, Thomas M McDermott Jr, The Hammond Police Dpt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERSON v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
BYRON PIERSON
Defendant:
JEFFERY BALDWIN, M KENDRA KLUMP, JAMES P. HANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hall v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
LaQuan M. Hall
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Gina L. Jones and Bernard A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
