Cases 41 - 50 of 1,006
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lee v. City of Bloomington, The et al
as 0:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Claire J. Lee
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, The, Bloomington HRA, Premier Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rangel v. Satele et al
as 0:2023cv02535
Plaintiff:
Mario Rangel
Defendant:
Tommy Satele and City of Plymouth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anspach v. City of Clarkfield et al
as 0:2023cv02509
Plaintiff:
Paul Anspach
Defendant:
City of Clarkfield, Jonathan Pierce and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crow v. Rasmussen et al
as 0:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Johnny James Crow
Defendant:
Eric Lee Rasmussen, Andrew Timothy Ruden and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
Krystal Pope
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Alexander Walls, Joshua Domek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Duluth et al
as 0:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Rebecca St. George, Chad Guenther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ball et al v. Nilsson et al
as 0:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball, Jennifer J. Ball, Jeannie Ball and others
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson, Ben Frye, Erik Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
