Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00371
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
D'Ercole v. Speers et al
as 8:2015cv00314
Defendant:
Lisa Anderson and Chris Speers
Plaintiff:
Eric J. D'Ercole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vester v. Hallock
as 8:2015cv00277
Defendant:
Daniel Hallock
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Vester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Akins v. Beutler et al
as 4:2015cv03057
Plaintiff:
Samar Akins
Defendant:
Mayor Chris Beutler, Lincoln Police Chief Peschong, Officer D Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Widtfeldt v. Nebraska State Bar Association et al
as 8:2015cv00030
Defendant:
Ashley D. Boettcher, Steven A. Brewster, Alan Brodbeck and others
402) 925-2564 (fax:
James Widtfeldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Croghan v. Brunning et al
as 4:2014cv03238
Defendant:
Shannon Anderson, W. Mark Ashford, John Brunning and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dale Croghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carper v. Carper
as 8:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Julie L. Carper
Defendant:
Michael D. Carper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson et al v. City of Omaha Nebraska et al
as 8:2014cv00004
Defendant:
Bradley D. Canterbury, City of Omaha, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Johnson, Juaquez Johnson, Octavius Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
