Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010mc03218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
D.T. v. Sheriff's Dept. of Baldwin County et al
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
D. T.
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. of Baldwin County , Huey Mack and Wal-Mart Supercenter of Bay Minette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Khonaizi v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2010cv01283
Plaintiff:
Sonja M Al-Khonaizi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Communication Commission, U.S. Dept. of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mims v. Marengo County et al
as 2:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Mims
Defendant:
Marengo County, Marengo County Sheriff's Dept., Jesse R. Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponder v. Huff et al (MAG+)
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dale Ponder
Defendant:
Loretta E. Huff, Sherry E. Dallas, Oglethorpe County Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smedley v. Ozark Police Dept. et al
as 1:2009cv01061
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smedley
Defendant:
Ozark Police Dept. and Officer Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smedley v. Ozark Police Dept. et al
as 2:2009cv00902
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smedley
Defendant:
Ozark Police Dept. and Johnny W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.G. v. Alabama Dept of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
as 7:2009cv01369
Plaintiff:
R.G.
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
