Cases 41 - 50 of 222
Calm Creek, Inc v. Juhan et al
as 3:2019cv01724
Defendant:
Does 1 through 5 and Ernestine Juhan
Plaintiff:
Calm Creek, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Cordova v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Defendant:
Officer Alexander Bennett, New Mexico State Police Department, Officer Joseph Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harry Donald Lemly, Jr. v. Lisa Mangat et al
as 8:2019cv01603
Plaintiff:
HARRY DONALD LEMLY, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD HAYDEN, LISA MANGAT, NICHOLAS P. MILWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodsky v. HiLine Coffee Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04308
Plaintiff:
Jay Brodsky
Defendant:
Does 1 through 5, Ted Snyder, HiLine Coffee Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elachkar v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02172
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Transit Authority, Mariarit Acquista and others
Plaintiff:
Houssam Elachkar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Brock v. Logsdon et al
as 6:2019cv06082
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 5, Dep. Amber Pellicane, Jane Does 1 through 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Lee Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian Moreno et al v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Matthew Sevilla, City of West Covina, Officer Malynik and others
Plaintiff:
Eileen Aquino and Christian Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. The County of Suffolk et. al.
as 2:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
Corey Robinson
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv00270
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through 5, Brendan Grace, Mandeep Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
