Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Harrison v. Franklin, et al.
as 4:2017cv01869
Plaintiff:
Connie Harrison
Defendant:
Alicia Franklin, Robert E Newey, Charley Prine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott E. Shine v. Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff
as 5:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Scott Everett Shine
Defendant:
Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Trident Seafood Corp
as 4:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Cliff M Franklin
Defendant:
Trident Seafood Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Brewster v. American Mensa Ltd
as 4:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
Steven Franklin Brewster
Defendant:
American Mensa Ltd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fair Housing Council of Greater San Antonio v. Franklin Companies et al
as 5:2015cv01060
Defendant:
Tina Belfield, Franklin Companies and Franklin Park Sonterra, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Council of Greater San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Craft-Rendon et al v. TransCanada Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00374
Respondent:
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP , Wood County Texas and Wood County Sherriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Benjamin-Franklin Sequoyah Craft-Rendon and Shannon Kathleen Bebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
