Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Hillis v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Augusta University, Marty Allen, M.D. Marcus Occhipinti and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tabor v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05531
Plaintiff:
Celisa Tabor
Defendant:
Reginald Johnson, Claude S. Lett, Ted Philbin and others
Spaulding v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00278
Plaintiff:
Vivian Diane Spaulding
Defendant:
Miranda Bearden, Does 1-10 and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 2:2019cv01725
Defendant:
Jody E Winder, Jacqueline Wills, Jesse James Gardner, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Jimita Rachel Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey et al v. The Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv04630
Plaintiff:
Melissa Riley Carey and Wallace Riley
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Antoine Caldwell, The Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pugh v. Bryson et al
as 4:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gerard J. Pugh
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Homer Bryson and District Attorney Meg Heap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young, MD et al v. Georgia Board of Regents et al
as 1:2018cv05324
Plaintiff:
Linda Susan Young and Timothy Young, MD
Defendant:
Billy Nichols, Georgia Board of Regents, Ted Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
