Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Seabrook v. Freeman et al
as 1:2015cv05797
Plaintiff:
Devere Seabrook
Defendant:
Correction Officer W. Freeman, Correction Officer T. Gernon, Correction Officer D. Abreu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv01192
Plaintiff:
Hasan Butler , Shawn White and Sean Terrell
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Joseph Ponte, Brian Suprenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WALKER v. NICHOLS et al
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WALKER
Defendant:
RALPH NICHOLS, PATRICIA BARNHART, SCOTT BURNHEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. CRUMP et al
as 2:2013cv03378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLISON
Defendant:
M. CRUMP , JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL SUPERVISOR, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS (NOS. 1 -2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hecht v. Correction Officer Best et al
as 1:2012cv04154
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hecht
Defendant:
Correction Officer Best, Correction Officer Caser, R. Lerouge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02169
Plaintiff:
Byron Curry
Defendant:
The City of New York, Singletary, Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Will County et al
as 1:2012cv02062
Plaintiff:
Cortez Branch
Defendant:
Will County, Paul Kaupas and John Doe Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2012cv01565
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County , Thomas Dart and John Doe Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
