Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Simon et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08391
Plaintiff:
Courtney Simon , Keyshawn Francois , Christian Mcknight and others
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Eric Healy, "John Doe" #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vessa v. City of White Plains
as 14-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Vessa
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Mary Doe 1-10, said names being ficticious and presently unknown, Westchester County District Attorney's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of White Plains, City of White Plains Police Department, Detective Lieutenant Eric Fischer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff:
Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
