Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warwick v. California Parole Advocacy Program (CalPAP) et al
as 3:2007cv02854
Plaintiff:
Joanne Warwick
Defendant:
California Parole Advocacy Program (CalPAP), Rick Heyer, Mary Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pobursky, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
as 1:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
James S Pobursky and Wanda Pobursky
Defendant:
Madera County, Sheriff's Department of Madera County, Madera County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swanson v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jamie Michelle Swanson, Jamie Michelle Swanson and Jamie Michelle Swanson
Defendant:
County of Orange, County of Orange, Orange County Animal Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 3:2000cv04599
Special Master:
Christy Lopez, Kelli M. Evans, Robert S. Warshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Delphine Allen, Paul Jones, Matthew Watson and others
Petitioner:
Francisco Negrete, William Berger, Brandon Hraiz and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Richard Word, Francisco Vazquez and others
Not Classified By Court:
Edward Swanson
Intervenor:
Oakland Police Officers Association and Coalition for Police Accountabiilty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates, et al v. United Parcel Serv
as 3:1999cv02216
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Bert Enos , Babaranti Oloyede and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service
Pecial_master:
Edward Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
