Cases 41 - 50 of 247
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and ELECTORATES
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv02448
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. MATARELLI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv01687
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN SMITH, LLC
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HAMILTON, STATE OF INDIANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POHLE v. PENCE et al
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN G ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLARS, LLC et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2020cv01625
Plaintiff:
DANLEEN1, INC., SAIL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS R. LOUKS, THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
ELLISON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2020cv00953
Plaintiff:
SHELLIE ELLISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Economan et al v. Cockrell et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
United States, James D Luttrull, Jr, Jessica Krug and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Dale Economan and Economan and Associates Family Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
