Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HUBBARD v. BOHMAN, et al
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAMONT HUBBARD
Defendant:
TRAVIS D. BOHMAN , J. L. STARLING , ROGER ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HUBBARD v. STARLING et al
as 1:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LAMONT HUBBARD
Defendant:
J. L. STARLING, ROGER ALLEN, TIM THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Roberts v. Kinston, et al
as 4:2009cv00207
Defendant:
Kinston, NC Department of Public Safety, Officer J.M. Gwartney and others
Plaintiff:
Marion Elijah Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEWIS v. JORDON, et al
as 1:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
JENNINGS RAY LEWIS
Defendant:
TRENTON JORDAN, TIM JORDON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HINTON, et al v. WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Plaintiff:
LUCIA P. HINTON, DAV MAR PARTNERS, LLC and CARING HANDS AND SUPPLEMENTARY ENRICHMENT EDUCATION, LLC
Defendant:
WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Mediator:
ANGELA N. GRAY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
