Cases 51 - 60 of 170
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 2:2019cv03701
Plaintiff:
ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant:
BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BRADY v. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, COUNTY OF BERGEN et al
as 2:2019cv16348
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, COUNTY OF BERGEN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia et al v. Benenati et al
as 3:2019cv05597
Defendant:
Thomas Benenati, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Garcia and Jana Archambeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PERSAD v. BOROUGH OF NEW MILFORD et al
as 2:2019cv12138
Plaintiff:
ROVIN PERSAD
Defendant:
SAMUEL GERAIS, BOROUGH OF NEW MILFORD, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WOLFGRAMM v. COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 13301 et al
as 1:2018cv13380
Plaintiff:
ROSAMUND WOLFGRAMM and ROSAMUND A. WOLFGRAMM
Defendant:
BETH NORTON, COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 2-13, DENNIS EICHFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv13119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
