Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
LEE, et al v. NEW CASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2015cv01498
Defendant:
AMY BLAKE, DARRELL HUGHES, NEW CASTLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DEVON BUCK and BENJAMIN LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DICUS v. LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01571
Defendant:
JARROD DUANE BRADBURY, DEVOY, LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MICHELLE DICUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARRICK v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv01137
Defendant:
KIRK BARRICK, TERESA BARRICK, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT et al v. VANTLIN et al
as 3:2014cv00092
Defendant:
WILLIAM ARBAUGH, RICHARD BLANTON, AMY BURROWS-BECKHAM and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA HURT, DEADRA HURT, DEBBIE HURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Vantlin et al
as 1:2014cv00196
Defendant:
Jeff Vantlin, Jack Spencer, William Arbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
