Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Bell v. Ivy Technical College et al
as 3:2014cv01622
Plaintiff:
Camille Bell
Defendant:
Ivy Technical College and Heather Cross Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fick v. LaPorte County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Moarine Fick
Defendant:
LaPorte County Sheriff's Department , Mike Mollenhauer , Sgt S Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SEELEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 2:2014cv00022
Defendant:
ROBERT W BAESLER, TANYA BELL, CLIFFORD CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUMPHRIES v. WISHARD HOSPITAL HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Defendant:
PORCHA DESS, PAM ELLIOTT, SAMIR GUPTA and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE BELL HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fields v. Fenstemaker et al
as 1:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Fields
Defendant:
Benjamin T Fenstemaker, John C Folk, Christopher M Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BELL v. PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00577
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. BELL
Defendant:
ECMC HOLDINGS CORPORATION and PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
