Cases 51 - 60 of 232
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Klaver v. Hamilton County Tennessee et al (DCLC2)
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
One John Doe K9 Officer, Daniel Wilkey, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Klaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Goolsby v. City of Bartlett et al
as 2:2019cv02434
Plaintiff:
Alan Ray Goolsby
Defendant:
Daniel Brown, Justine Reams, City of Bartlett Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stark v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2019cv02396
Defendant:
MPD Officer Ervin, MPD Sgt. Daniel Cordero, MPD Deputy Chief Don Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Diane Stark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kilgore et al v. Ruskey et al (JRG1)
as 1:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Jeff Mosely, Lt. Daniel Ruskey, James Hutcheson and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kilgore and William Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cobble v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv00132
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cobble v. The State of Georgia
as 1:2019mc00005
Defendant:
The State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
The Estate of Daniel Hambrick v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee (Metro) et al
as 3:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Daniel Hambrick
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee (Metro) and Andrew Delke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilgore v. Ruskey et al
as 1:2019cv00055
Plaintiff:
Cassie Kilgore
Defendant:
Daniel Ruskey, Jeff Mosely and James Hutcheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messick v. Rusky, et al (PLR2)
as 1:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Fred Messick
Defendant:
James Hutcheson, Lt. Daniel Ruskey and Jeff Mosely
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
