Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Davis et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2015cv10547
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Charles Flanagan, Officer Novak and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Davis and Hatema Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sondey v. Wolowiec et al
as 2:2014cv13808
Plaintiff:
Sophie Sondey
Defendant:
Chad Wolowiec, Todd Benczkowski, Darrin Laban and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beach v. Ogemaw, County of et al
as 2:2014cv13463
Plaintiff:
June Beach
Defendant:
Ogemaw, County of , Howie S. Hanft , John Doe 1 sherrif dept employee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Skinner et al
as 2:2014cv12277
Plaintiff:
Jabril Muhammad
Defendant:
Leon Skinner, Mark Wing, Roy Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv14356
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Highland Park, City of et al
as 2:2013cv13745
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Jones
Defendant:
Highland Park, City of, Eric Hollaway, Carnecki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
v. Anderson et al
as 2:2013cv12629
Defendant:
Det. Police Officer Anderson, Det. Police Officer John Doe #1, Det. Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Graham v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2012cv14491
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Graham
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ralph Godbee, John Doe and others
El Ssayed v. Western Michigan University et al
as 1:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Hatem El Ssayed
Defendant:
Western Michigan University , Muhamed Sultan , Carla Koretsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Holden et al v. Miller-Smith et al
as 1:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Alan Holden and Nicole Holden
Defendant:
Penelope Miller-Smith , Shelly Jensen , Terry Babbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
