Cases 51 - 60 of 581
Grimes v. Mossy Nissan Kearny Mesa
as 3:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Mossy Nissan Kearny Mesa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Grimes v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC
as 3:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Grimes v. Santander Consumer USA
as 3:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grimes v. United States Olympic Committee
as 1:2022cv02222
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
United States Olympic Committee, Ernie Marson, Sr., Sunny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIMES v. OMBUDSMAN OF U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2022cv02458
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
OMBUDSMAN OF U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION and SERENA AMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grimes v. Black Diamond Recovery, LLC.
as 1:2022cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Black Diamond Recovery, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Toms Towing, LLC
as 1:2022cv02006
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Toms Towing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Pueblo Self Storage
as 1:2022cv01934
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Pueblo Self Storage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Timika Scott
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, Sheriff Sid Gautreaux, Warden Dennis Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grimes v. PNC Bank
as 3:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
