Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Prater II v. Brindle et al
as 3:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Prater II
Defendant:
Jeremy Brindle and Peru City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seman v. Troyer, et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Bradley Seman
Defendant:
Tim R Troyer , Adam Crall , Eric Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milligan v. Portage City of, et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Milligan
Defendant:
Portage City of , David Prickett , John Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ARRINGTON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2017cv01539
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ARRINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, JEREMY DODD and TED SECREASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE et al v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00987
Plaintiff:
MOORE, JEREMY EUGENE MOORE, NATASHA ROSE MOORE and others
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, KEITH RAY, JENNIE L MAUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MILLER v. CITY OF RICHMOND et al
as 1:2017cv00901
Defendant:
CITY OF RICHMOND, CHARLES IRVIN, CHASE PATTON and others
Plaintiff:
MESHACH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENE v. LARUSSA et al
as 1:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
DANA GREENE
Defendant:
KEVIN A. LARUSSA, JEREMY M. LEE, MICHAEL A. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANCINI et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv02048
Plaintiff:
K. C. and MARA MANCINI
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOES 1-50, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKLEAR v. HERALD et al
as 4:2016cv00085
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., NADIR AL-SHAMI, JEREMY ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ELAINE LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
