Cases 51 - 60 of 337
Stallings v. Bittell et al
as 0:2021cv02395
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Kevin Stallings
Defendant:
Andrew Bittell, Michael Osbeck, Jr., Christopher Cushenbery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKizzie v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2021cv02265
Plaintiff:
DAMAREION MCKIZZIE
Defendant:
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, WILLIAM GREGORY, Minneapolis, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer v. County of Dakota et al
as 0:2021cv02243
Plaintiff:
Brady Fischer
Defendant:
County of Dakota and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of Brooklyn Center et al
as 0:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Aurora Thessaly Adams
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. City of Brooklyn Center et al
as 0:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Iverson
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Officer Doe #1 Officer John, Officer John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cajune et al v. Independent School District 194 et al
as 0:2021cv01812
Plaintiff:
Bob Cajune, Cynthia Cajune, Kalynn Aker and others
Defendant:
Independent School District 194 and Michael Baumann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Doe et al
as 0:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Darius Hakeem Brooks
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gelhaye v. Arradondo et al
as 0:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Gelhaye
Defendant:
Medaria Arradondo, John 1 Doe, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leatham v. City of Minneapolis
as 0:2021cv01429
Plaintiff:
Marcia Leatham
Defendant:
John Does and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
