Cases 51 - 59 of 59
BOYER v. ROSS et al
as 2:2018cv03048
Defendant:
JOHN MCGRODY, PHILADELPHIA LICENSE AND INSPECTION BOARD OF REVIEW, LIEUTENANT LISA KING and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE' BOYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerhart et al v. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Glunt, Ellen Gerhart, Alex Lotorto and others
Defendant:
Sunoco Logistics, L.P., Deputy Sheriff Poe, Nick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. DETECTIVE JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2013cv02743
Plaintiff:
C. REGINALD JOHNSON and JAMES ALTON STEPHENS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE I, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. MECCA et al
as 2:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
RINALDO BAEZ
Defendant:
JOSEPH MECCA, "COUNSELOR EARL, "MERCER COUNSELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIORE v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2009cv04247
Plaintiff:
JOHN FIORE
Defendant:
CITY OF BETHLEHEM, MAYOR JOHN CALLAHAN, POLICE COMMISSIONER MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vacek v. Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board et al
as 1:2008cv01238
Plaintiff:
Dan L. Vacek
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board, Joesph A. Massa, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WASHINGTON, et al. v. C.O.T. MORGAN, et al
as 2:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
C.O.T. MORGAN, C.O.T. MORGAN, T.S. THARP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SOLLMAN v. RENNINGER et al
as 2:2007cv01183
Defendant:
OFFICER TIMOTHY LAMBERT, CHIEF OF STAFF STUART GALLAHER, THE CITY OF EASTON and others
Plaintiff:
CARIN E. SOLLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
