Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Kesel v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Diana L Kesel
Defendant:
Karen M Martin , Porter County Indiana , Porter County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hammond v. Martin et al
as 2:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hammond
Defendant:
Karen M Martin , Porter County Indiana , Porter County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marlin v. Haynes et al
as 2:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Marlin
Defendant:
Anthony Haynes, M. Martin, R. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson et al v. Oaks Apartments, Oakcreek-Lincoln et al
as 2:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Veronica R. Pearson and Evelyn M. Martin
Defendant:
Oaks Apartments, Oakcreek-Lincoln, FPI Management Company and Samuel G. Stamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Brainard v. Provost et al
as 2:2011cv00850
Plaintiff:
William J. Brainard
Defendant:
Eleanor Provost, James A. Boscoe, Douglas C. Boyack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brainard v. Provost et al
as 1:2011cv00737
Plaintiff:
William J. Brainard
Defendant:
Eleanor Provost, James A. Boscoe, Douglas C. Boyack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Martinez v. L. Donaldson, et al
as 10-17200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
L. DONALDSON, CDCR Legal Analysis Processing Unit, in his Official and Individual capacities, JAMES TILTON, In his official and individual capacities, ELLIOTT POWE, CDCR Parole Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Martin v. Martin
as 1:2010cv01644
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Martin
Defendant:
Gonda M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
