Cases 51 - 60 of 181
Sarmiento v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al
as 1:2017cv03411
Plaintiff:
Sheila Sarmiento
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, ABB Ltd., Goldman, Sachs & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coulter v. Tatananni et al
as 1:2017cv02800
Plaintiff:
Jean Coulter
Defendant:
Blaze Tatananni, Jean Tatananni, Morgan Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv81924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Bank National Association v. Mines et al
as 3:2016cv01465
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Joseph Washington Mines, Jr., Unknown Spouse of Joseph Washington Mines, Jr., A/K/A Joseph W. Mines, Jr., Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holding, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Joseph Washington Mines, Jr.
Counter_defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Novick v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
as 2:2016cv02256
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Novick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ajamian v. Dominguez
as 16-2908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward Dominguez and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
Defendant:
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Ajamian v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 1:2016cv02973
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Smith Barney and Edward Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
